The threat of a US invasion by President-elect Donald Trump has raised concerns about the potential consequences for Mexico. While Trump has made several campaign promises to combat fentanyl trafficking and irregular migration, it is essential to examine the legal and military requirements for such an operation.
According to Cornell University’s Wex, the President’s power as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces requires Congressional approval for a declaration of war or a specific statutory authorization. However, presidents have previously led military operations without Congress’ explicit consent, citing national emergencies or security concerns.
The US Code (Section 50) outlines three scenarios where the President can introduce armed forces: a declaration of war, a specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency created by an attack on the country. In all these cases, Congressional approval is necessary.
In recent history, the US has participated in military operations without explicit Congressional approval, including the Korean and Vietnam wars, Operation Desert Storm, the 2001 Afghanistan War, and the 2002 Iraq War. However, these actions were not officially declared as wars by Congress.
Regarding a potential invasion of Mexico, historian Pedro Salmerón notes that the US government has historically been cautious about military intervention due to the country’s large size, complex geography, and fierce resistance from its people. In his account of the “Punitive Expedition” in 1916, he mentions that the US would need around 500,000 soldiers to occupy Mexico.
In light of these requirements, it is crucial for both governments to engage in open communication and diplomacy to address their shared concerns about fentanyl trafficking and irregular migration. A military incursion without proper authorization and consent from both countries could lead to catastrophic consequences and undermine regional stability.
In conclusion, while Trump’s campaign promises have raised alarm bells, a US invasion of Mexico would require careful consideration of the legal and military requirements outlined above. It is essential for both nations to prioritize diplomacy and cooperation in addressing their shared challenges, rather than resorting to aggressive measures that could lead to devastating outcomes.
Source: Radio Formula
