In an unprecedented ruling in Tabasco, a Family Court in the municipality of Centro ordered the payment of spousal support—specifically for a pet—for “Lucas,” a three-year-old Husky, following the separation of the couple who raised him.
The judicial decision acknowledges the obligation of one of the owners to contribute financially toward the costs of the pet’s food, health care, and general well-being; the animal remained in Estela’s care following the couple’s breakup.
His owner explained that she decided to include “Lucas” in the family lawsuit due to the significant costs involved in maintaining a large-breed dog, and because—from the moment they acquired the animal—they had both agreed to share the expenses.
The woman faced criticism and skepticism from friends and family members for requesting financial support for a pet, as such a situation had never before been witnessed in the municipality.
However, Estela recounted that during their time living together, both individuals assumed responsibilities for Lucas’s care; she therefore considered it unfair that, following their separation, the entire financial burden would fall solely upon her.
The attorney representing the case, Bellanila Andrea Hernández Reyes, highlighted that the ruling reflects a new legal perspective that recognizes companion animals as sentient beings and as members of what are known as “multi-species families.”
The lawyer noted that this marks the first case of its kind to be resolved favorably in Tabasco, and she suggested that it could serve as a precedent for future legal reforms regarding the guardianship, custody, and financial support of pets.
Consequently, she called upon the Tabasco State Congress to consider amendments to local legislation that would provide greater legal certainty regarding the rights and obligations of companion animal owners in cases of separation or divorce.
What obligations will “Lucas’s Dad” have?
The lawsuit was filed in May 2025, and after several months of litigation, the judge issued a ruling in March of this year.
As a result of the judgment, the defendant is now legally obligated to make periodic financial contributions intended to cover the costs of food, veterinary care, and other necessities for Lucas. This case stands in contrast to the high incidence of animal abuse prevailing in the state, where—between January and April alone—more than 300 complaints regarding acts of cruelty were filed with the State Attorney General’s Office.
Source: elfinanciero
