Uber drivers in Cancun have ceased operations due to safety concerns following a series of attacks, despite a recent injunction declaring the prohibition of private vehicle transport services unconstitutional. The drivers are awaiting an official statement from Uber regarding the injunction granted by the Eighth District Court in Quintana Roo.
Drivers’ Decision
Operators of Uber and other ride-sharing platforms in Cancun have decided to stop working as a precautionary measure. They cited the lack of guarantees for their safety, even after the federal injunction was granted. Antonio “M,” an Uber driver who chose to remain anonymous, expressed concerns about the prevailing interests of various groups in the transportation sector, making it unsafe for drivers to work freely.
Legal Context
The Eighth District Court of the Judicial Branch of the Federation in Cancun granted an injunction against the Law and Mobility Regulation of Quintana Roo, deeming them unconstitutional. This decision was in favor of companies providing services through digital platforms, such as Uber.
Ongoing Risks
Despite the legal victory, drivers remain cautious. “Imoveqroo continues to carry out operations, and the National Guard is still active at Cancun International Airport,” said one driver. He emphasized that the injunction does not protect drivers from physical attacks by taxi drivers or other groups.
Awaiting Official Statement
Drivers are waiting for Uber to issue an official statement detailing the implications of the injunction and addressing concerns about safety and legal responsibilities. They seek assurances that Uber will cover expenses related to arrests and fines imposed by Imoveqroo, which can amount to 50,000 pesos, as well as towing fees. Additionally, drivers face the risk of losing access to their vehicles for up to 15 days.
Legal Justification
The injunction states that “the prohibition of the activity of transport through the platform service by private vehicles has no reasonable justification, as the service provided by an individual, privately, does not affect public order or social interest.” Consequently, the Mobility Law and its regulations violate the right to mobility enshrined in Article 4 of the Constitution.
Source: Por Esto
