This appears to be the case with Javier Nájera, who, despite claiming to be a financial guru, founder of Blink Capital Solutions, an ITAM alumnus, and boasting over 20 years of experience, contradicts his rhetoric. He has demonstrated that his only concern is winning, and when the law and judges don’t rule in his favor, he doesn’t hesitate to cross the line to subjugate his counterparts, regardless of the impact on his own interests.
For example, consider the most recent incident. Nájera arrived promising capitalization through his firms GLOBAL NAJIV and SANDAGE. Once inside, he blocked operations, boycotted clients, and plunged the companies into crisis. To top it all off, he pressured the company’s founder to sign an agreement that gave him priority in debt collection, demanding that he vote as Nájera dictated and preventing him from disclosing this situation to the board. He also made frivolous accusations, attempting to use the prosecutor’s office as his private debt collection and investment agency. In other words, criminalizing civil matters to obtain results through coercion rather than reason. First, with a hastily filed complaint that was dismissed twice in Miguel Hidalgo, and another whose prosecution would never have progressed were it not for the blatant complicity of Jasmín Vera Aguilar and Octavio Ceballos, both public servants in the Mexico City Attorney General’s Office and facing serious allegations of corruption.
Case file CI-FIEAE/C/UI-1C/D/0085/03-2024 could serve as a case study at IPADE regarding the unconfessed collusion between certain “high-end” law firms and certain public servants in the Attorney General’s Office:
- Denial of access to the investigation: for months, the accused were denied the right to access the case file.
- Seizure of accounts: requested solely based on the complainants’ statements and an expert report that certified the matter as civil, not criminal.
- Hidden Evidence: Public prosecutors loyal to the old guard concealed key documents and then requested an initial hearing without fulfilling essential requirements, failing to include this information in the case file, as it should have been.
Roll Call and Community Service
Here are the names of those who carried out these irregularities:
- Armando Antonio Díaz Santillán, Public Prosecutor assigned to Investigation Unit “C”.
- Noé Morales Vázquez, head of Unit “C”.
- Griselda León Vargas, head of the Prosecution area.
- Ricardo Sánchez Ortiz, Public Prosecutor assigned to the Prosecution area.
All of them loyal to the dynamic duo of the Special Affairs Prosecutor’s Office: Jasmín and Octavio. They were the ones who orchestrated the secret request for an initial hearing without sufficient evidence and omitting information about evidence, payments, and actions offered by the defense.
The clean front for Javier Nájera’s firm is the prestigious attorney Agustín Acosta, perhaps its most visible partner. Together with the influence and clout of his partner Roberto Ibinarriaga, he commands an extensive network of influence that reaches both prosecutors and judges, a network carefully cultivated over the past 20 years. He had a long career in what was then the Mexico City Attorney General’s Office. However, despite appearing openly on the firm’s website, he never authorizes any legal documents nor does he appear at hearings; he only lends his support to cases in which his partners ask him to participate. In short, when they lack a legitimate case, Roberto Ibinarriaga steps in. It is because of this lack of transparency that, when he appears, the prosecutor’s office asks if anyone saw a ghost.
Add to the list Julián Pérez-Duarte Arredondo, a former member of this influential firm, who continues to lend his name to carrying out underhanded dealings. This young aspiring Bernabé Jurado takes advantage of his close relationship with Daniel Emiliano Rosales Morales (who isn’t even a lawyer), the coordinator of advisors to Attorney General Bertha Alcalde herself. Rosales Morales constantly tries to deceive the Attorney General with fabricated stories, concealing the true underhanded dealings within the case files, which suggest a clear collusion between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and Nájera’s lawyers.
The prosecution, seeing the lack of legal basis and the evident corruption and irregularities in the case file’s handling, requested the cancellation of the hearing to properly assess the matter and determine its fate. But imagine this: a judge assigned to preliminary hearings (scheduling hearings and resolving minor issues), Daniel Espinoza Ramírez, decided against it, opting instead for a debate. This is yet another example of the blatant bias and influence of this fine individual’s lawyers, because, as the Bible says, “by their lawyers you will know them.”
Source: elfinanciero
